(AP Photo/Wayne Parry, File)
After lengthy battle, environmentalists hail New Jersey’s decision — coupled with decision by New York officials — as major breakthrough
(AP Photo, File)
At hearing, expert witness for opponent of Gloucester County project cites evidence of toxic chemical in site report
Ron Gilbert from Flickr (CC BY-ND 2.0)
At online hearing, Delaware River Basin Commission says it sees no reason to change its mind on Gibbstown project
Howard J from Flickr (CC BY-NC 2.0)
Critics say change will make it easier to develop wetlands and streams; EPA says new rule is grounded in law
energy.gov
Environmental group alleges that planned South Jersey export terminal would have a range of impacts, including on wildlife and water
am dougherty from Flickr (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0)
By designating them as Category One, agency safeguards waterways of exceptional ecological importance
Henryk Niestroj from Pixabay
Advocates say new rule is an important step forward in protecting public health
Creative Commons
PennEast’s decision to build pipeline in two phases has reignited objections to project, rekindled concerns that have been seething for years
Toxics Release Inventory shows companies released over 6 million pounds of harmful substances that year, the first increase in on-site releases since 2014
lifeontheedgedrones
Researchers who study our vulnerable shorelines are moving to higher ground
Views expressed by our advertisers and sponsors are their own, and are not endorsed by NJ Spotlight News.