A year after making a host of tax increases the centerpiece of his first state budget request, Gov. Phil Murphy is offering lawmakers a more balanced approach for fiscal year 2020. A $38.6 billion budget plan he unveiled yesterday includes new revenue from a millionaire’s tax but also savings initiatives worth more than $1 billion.
The combination of new tax revenue and money freed up through savings proposals — that include departmental belt tightening and changes to public-employee health coverage — would allow the state to cover several notable spending increases that Murphy is recommending for fiscal 2020. These includeand $25 million in new funding for New Jersey Transit.
The first-term Democrat is also calling for a record state payment into the public-worker pension system of nearly $4 billion and is seeking to increase the state’s rainy-day surplus to over $1 billion for the first time in roughly a decade.
“We are building a stronger fiscal house for New Jersey,” Murphy said during a nearly hourlong budget address at the State House. “We are replacing gimmicks with stability.”
While Democrats who control the Legislature staked out a firm position against broad-based tax hikes heading into yesterday’s budget message, they credited Murphy yesterday for finding savings initiatives and showing a willingness to work with them on other fiscal policies. That marks a change from last year, when Murphy suggested a series ofwere the best way the state could responsibly cover its growing obligations. (Their disagreements went largely unresolved until the very last minute, nearly causing a government shutdown.) But Republicans and business groups criticized the governor’s call yesterday for a higher top-end marginal income-tax rate on earnings over $1 million. They also questioned whether the projected savings would materialize by the end of FY 2020.
Compared to Murphy’senacted last July, spending would increase by a little over a $1 billion based on the spending plan he put forward yesterday. Much of the increase, nearly $600 million, would go into the pension system, pushing the contribution from payment up to $3.8 billion in fiscal 2020.
The governor’s budget allocates another $2.7 billion for, but that figure represents a decrease of about $500 million compared to what the state is spending this year on worker health benefits. Total savings from the healthcare initiatives — which include auditing plan enrollees and shifting retirees into less costly Medicare plans — would amount to nearly $900 million, according to Murphy. The state would save another $212 million through departmental savings initiatives.
“You heard that number right,” Murphy said to lawmakers yesterday. “Over $1.1 billion in real and sustainable savings.”
The governor’s budget also ends or scales backthat were a hallmark of former Republican Gov. Chris Christie’s tenure and that were carried on by Murphy last year, including taking revenue from the New Jersey Turnpike Authority and the state’s to help offset a reliance on rider fares for NJ Transit. The budget also boosts NJ Transit funding by $25 million. And Murphy said yesterday that if lawmakers approve his budget proposal there would be no fare increase in fiscal year 2020.
On the revenue side of the ledger, Murphy’s budget calls for boosting income-tax collections with nearly $450 million in new revenue from a proposed 10.75 percent top-end marginal rate that would be applied to earnings over $1 million. The millionaire’s tax proposal was a core element of Murphy’s 2017 campaign platform, and it mimics something he tried to get lawmakers to agree to last year as part of his FY 2019 budget. In the end, the higher rate was only established for earnings over $5 million, with the rate of 8.97 percent remaining in place for all earnings between $500,000 and $5 million.
In making the case for the millionaire’s tax again yesterday, Murphy said it would help to reduce the burden on the state’s middle class by drawing in more revenue from a group of taxpayers that he suggested was protected by policies enacted by Christie. Administration officials also noted in budget briefings that thousands of the state’s millionaires are actually out-of-state residents who file returns in New Jersey due to income they earn here or through business partnerships based here.
“Let’s be absolutely clear — this is not a tax that will be paid by anyone in the middle class,” Murphy said.
Murphy’s budget proposal counts on $60 million in new revenue from a tax the state would apply to the sale of recreational marijuana as lawmakers continue to work on athey hope to have in place in time for the start of the 2020 calendar year. The governor is also proposing to increase taxes on the sale of firearms, permits and ammunition to draw in nearly $5 million in new revenue. Some of those fees have remained unchanged since the 1960s.
“It is actually cheaper to get a permit to purchase a handgun — $2 — than it is to get a dog license in many of our communities,” Murphy said.
Another $30 million in new revenue would be raised from a proposed corporate-responsibility fee to be levied on employers with more than 50 workers who are receiving state-funded Medicaid health benefits. Murphy said this initiative would ensure “the rest of us” aren’t being forced to cover the cost of these businesses’ employee healthcare.
In all, this year’s tax-hike proposals mark a significant shift from last year, when the governor asked lawmakers to approve more than $1.5 billion worth of new or increased taxes. And while the millionaire’s tax and gun-fee proposals represent Murphy’s second effort at establishing such policies, his new budget drops last year’s push to restore the state’s 7 percent sales-tax rate.
There is also no increase in funding being proposed by Murphy for the state’s popular Homestead and Senior Freeze property-tax relief programs, with income eligibility limits set to remain unchanged. That was one of the areas lawmakers suggested yesterday they would look to boost even as they also expressed a continued unwillingness to approve any new tax increases.
“I appreciate and applaud his effort to achieve sustainable savings. However, I remain convinced that we can achieve additional substantial savings through reforms and other government efficiencies and not rely on a broad-based tax,” said Assembly Speaker Craig Coughlin (D-Middlesex).
Senate President Steve Sweeney, who has been pushing for changes to public-worker pension benefits this year as part of a broader cost-cutting initiative, also suggested yesterday that lawmakers will be looking to build off the savings initiatives Murphy is proposing.
“This is a positive first step forward,” said Sweeney (D-Gloucester). “There’s many more steps that need to be taken.”
For their part, Republicans raised questions about the $1.1 billion in projected savings that Murphy will be relying on to keep his fiscal 2020 budget in balance. They also called on the administration and lawmakers to go further with other cuts. And they also questioned whether the state budget is truly in balance as the pension contribution — even at the record level proposed by Murphy — would still leave the state with an unfunded liability that totals more than $100 billion by some estimates.
“It’s balanced on a cash basis because we are denying our obligations, because we’re not paying (for) the things we need to pay,” said Sen. Declan O’Scanlon (R-Monmouth). “On an obligations basis, it’s billions of dollars out of balance.”
“If you had a credit card with this much debt on it, you wouldn’t sleep very well,” said Assembly Republican Leader Jon Bramnick (R-Union).
Business groups also took aim at Murphy’s latest attempt to establish a true millionaires’ tax, suggesting it would encourage the state’s wealthiest residents to flee New Jersey for places with less aggressive income-tax policies.
“The pain from this new tax would be severely disproportionate to its benefit,” said Tom Bracken, president of the New Jersey Chamber of Commerce.
But liberal groups that have long been calling for such a tax policy to be enacted praised Murphy for once again proposing a tax hike that they labeled “tax fairness.”
“Given the state’s growing income inequality, racial disparities, and lopsided tax code, asking New Jersey’s wealthiest individuals to pay a little bit more is the definition of fairness,” said Sheila Reynertson, senior policy analyst for New Jersey Policy Perspective, a left-leaning think tank based in Trenton.