The New Year may prove to be quite costly to customers of the state’s gas and electric utilities.
Beginning next Monday, the state Board of Public Utilities kicks off a proceeding to determine how much of the $640 million Jersey Central Power & Light will be able to recover in costs it incurred from the spate of extreme storms that battered New Jersey in the past few years.
The case is separate from another proposal by the state’s second-largest electric utility seeking approval to raise its rates by $31.5 million -- a 1.4 percent boost to the average customer’s bill. JCP&L serves 1 million customers in central and northern New Jersey.
The JCP&L proceeding is the first of several cases to come before the regulatory agency in which the state’s utilitiesracked up restoring power and service to their gas and electric customers after Hurricane Sandy and other storms.
At the same time, the utilities are being pressed by the Christie administration to invest in their infrastructure to avert the widespread power outages that businesses and homeowners suffered during those storms. These costs could exceed $4 billion over the next decade, according to filings by the utilities. It is unlikely that the requests will be granted in full, based on prior BPU regulatory cases.
The biggest case before the agency involves the state’s largest gas and electric utility, Public Service Electric & Gas. It initially filed a proposal 11 months ago seeking to invest $3.9 billion over the next 10 years, but the case before the board now involves a plan to spend $2.6 billion over the next five years to harden its grid.
The Newark utility’s case already has been the subject of public hearings last year, although settlement discussions have begun between adversaries in the matter in an effort to avoid a more drawn out proceeding before a BPU commissioner. Typically, utilities like to settle cases to avoid the legal expenses and delays involved in such quasi-judicial proceedings.
The proposal has generated widely divergent views, with the state Division of Rate Counsel, AARP, and a coalition of large energy users opposing the filing, which is strongly supported by labor groups and scores of municipalities.
With electric customers already stuck with some of the highest energy bills in the nation, the decisions pose a difficult balancing act for the BPU. How much do the utilities need to invest into make them more resilient to more frequent severe storms, a prospect BPU President Bob Hanna has often said is likely to be the new normal.
Recognizing that dilemma, the agency earlier this year established: one to determine what the utilities should recover from expenses incurred during recent bad weather, and another to establish steps the utilities should take to prevent the kind of extensive and prolonged outages that occurred during Hurricane Sandy.
To some, the timing is right to invest in necessary upgrades to gas and electric systems, primarily because customers have benefitted from a steep drop in natural gas prices because of relatively new deposits of the fuel found in Pennsylvania, New York, and other states.
As a result, winter heating bills have fallen dramatically for customers in the past few years, shaving as much as 39 percent off ratepayers’ bills since 2009. The drop in natural gas prices also has contributed to a decline in electricity bills because the fuel generally sets the price for what suppliers get for the power their generating units produce.
In another matter pending before the BPU, the agency is also expected to make a decision on a proposal by Fishermen’s Atlantic City Wind Farm to build a pilot project about three miles offshore from the resort. The project is opposed by the BPU staff as not being cost effective for utility ratepayers, who will bear much of the expense of developing the pilot.