Poll: What’s the Best Way to End Standoff in State Supreme Court?

Lee Keough | August 15, 2013 | Polling
Playing tit-for-tat with the state's highest court is bad for everyone -- especially the people who call Jersey home

christie 3-by-2
Gov. Chris Christie and the Democrats in the state Legislature are at a standoff when it comes to nominating justices to the New Jersey Supreme Court.

Christie has made no secret of the fact that he wants to remake the court in his image, by appointing men and women who share his political agenda. The Dems want to keep to an unwritten tradition that dates back to 1947 that no more than four of the seven justices can be from the same party, thus helping to ensure bipartisan balance.

The dispute began in 2010 when Christie refused to reappoint John Wallace, the lone African-American on the court and a Democratic nominee. The Dems responded in kind by blocking the appointment of one Republican and one Republican-leaning independent. They also have refused to consider two other of the governor’s nominees.

This week the governor decided not to [link:https://www.njspotlight.com/stories/13/08/13/christie-s-judicial-shuffle-escalates-supreme-court-battle/renominate Associate Justice Helen Hoens, a Republican who has been loyal to his agenda, saying he didn’t want to throw her into the partisan fray. Instead, he nominated a Hispanic Republican, Superior Court Judge Faustino Fernandez-Vina. That move puts Democrats in a double bind: They can either acquiesce to Christie’s wishes or turn their back on a Hispanic nominee.

We’re in this together
For a better-informed future. Support our nonprofit newsroom.
Donate to NJ Spotlight